国产观A puppeteer's ability to bring inanimate objects to life attracts the attention of the Nazis during World War II.
国产观A puppeteer's ability to bring inanimate objects to life attracts the attention of the Nazis during World War II.
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
回复 :雨屋草太(井浦新 饰)和发小星野乐人(成田凌 饰)踏上了寻找都市传说“火鸟”的旅途。一路上他们邂逅了各色各样的人,与此同时,草太和乐人的秘密也随之一点一点地浮出水面。这趟旅行背后的原因到底是什么?为什么是“火鸟” ?一个巨大的惊喜正在终点等着他们。
回复 :1962年,原本平静的法国西南小镇受到了阿尔及利亚革命风暴的影响。一所寄宿中学里,羞涩的男孩弗朗索瓦(盖尔·莫雷尔 Gaël Morel 饰 )与女孩玛依(艾洛迪·布歇 Élodie Bouchez 饰)是一对精神恋人。弗朗索瓦对来自意大利的英俊少年赛杰(斯戴芬·里多 Stéphane Rideau 饰)产生了强烈的情感,并诱惑他与自己发生了关系。而赛杰却表示自己爱上了玛依,但玛依因喜欢弗朗索瓦而拒绝了他。阿尔及利亚战争爆发了,赛杰的哥哥皮埃尔面临上前线的困境,玛依的母亲本来可以帮助皮埃尔逃脱兵役,但她拒绝给予帮助,导致皮埃尔战死在阿尔及利亚。被迫离开阿尔及利亚的恩利(弗雷德里克·戈尼 Frédéric Gorny 饰)来到了寄宿中学,他偏激和强烈的政治观点与大伙格格不入,他强迫弗朗索瓦直面自己的性取向而招来赛杰的憎恨。恩利得知阿尔及利亚革命成功,他愤恨不已,在去镇上抗议的路上遇到了玛依,对她产生了感情。四人在混乱的情感纠纷中迎来了毕业会考成绩的公布。