《引力邊緣》(2013)幕後父子兵再度聯手,男女上回是父親艾方素卡朗執導,男女今次就由兒子莊拿斯上陣,父親任監製。也是求生的故事,教人驚心動魄的不止於外太空,地球更危險。《向政府說不》(37屆)的基爾加西亞般奴飾演墨西哥非法移民摩西,夢想家庭團聚,偷渡穿越美國邊界。豈料遇上邊境巡邏的嗜殺排外之徒,濫用私刑,持槍獵殺,令追尋自由的冒險之旅,頓變極度恐慌的生死逃亡。邊境荒漠成為殺戮戰場,家人所贈的玩具熊到底是護身符還是催命咒?影片有如一則現代出埃及記,為當下美國右派民粹主義勢力崛起敲響警鐘。
《引力邊緣》(2013)幕後父子兵再度聯手,男女上回是父親艾方素卡朗執導,男女今次就由兒子莊拿斯上陣,父親任監製。也是求生的故事,教人驚心動魄的不止於外太空,地球更危險。《向政府說不》(37屆)的基爾加西亞般奴飾演墨西哥非法移民摩西,夢想家庭團聚,偷渡穿越美國邊界。豈料遇上邊境巡邏的嗜殺排外之徒,濫用私刑,持槍獵殺,令追尋自由的冒險之旅,頓變極度恐慌的生死逃亡。邊境荒漠成為殺戮戰場,家人所贈的玩具熊到底是護身符還是催命咒?影片有如一則現代出埃及記,為當下美國右派民粹主義勢力崛起敲響警鐘。
回复 :比利·塔吉特(马克·沃尔伯格 Mark Wahlberg 饰)是一名备受尊敬的纽约警察。然而在一次追捕杀人犯人中致后者死亡,最终审判结果被私下篡改,犯人被定为自卫,而被市民称为“英雄”的塔吉特却被迫离开警局。7年后,塔吉特以一名私家侦探的身份重新出现,然而市场并不景气,濒临破产之际,市长霍斯泰特勒(罗素·克劳 Russell Crowe 饰)找到他,让他帮忙查出妻子凯瑟琳(凯瑟琳·泽塔-琼斯 Catherine Zeta-Jones 饰)的情夫。然而事成之后,塔吉特却渐渐发现事件并非表面上那么简单,在此背后隐藏的政权利益、金钱交易和肉体买卖仿佛黑幕般笼罩着纽约这座破碎之城,牵扯其中的甚至还有7年前自己那桩冤案……
回复 :影片主要讲述了盛世年间,道医林萧和亲传弟子田小邪为了清除恐怖的神秘病毒,解救天下苍生而经历一系列磨难的故事。
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...