红蚂蚁
发表于4分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
三郎王青
发表于5分钟前
回复
:从学生时代起,其貌不扬的穆瑞尔(托妮·科莱特 Toni Collette 饰)便被同伴们断言不可能走入婚姻的殿堂,但即便如此,逐渐踏入社会的穆瑞尔依旧对婚姻充满了渴望。一次偶然中,穆瑞尔和曾经的校友朗达(瑞切尔·格里菲斯 Rachel Griffiths 饰)重逢了,两人相见如故一拍即合,遂即前往悉尼过起了“同居”生活。穆瑞尔结识了名叫布莱斯(Matt Day 饰)的男子,布莱斯是一名运动员,梦想是能够代表国家参加奥运会。终于,穆瑞尔和布莱斯携手踏入了婚姻的殿堂,但随着时间的推移,穆瑞尔才发现布莱斯对自己并没有爱意只剩利用。心灰意冷的穆瑞尔回到了朗达的身边,而此时的朗达已经换上了癌症,时日无多。
安德列里欧
发表于5分钟前
回复
:“清醒梦”(Lucid Dreaming)是在做梦时保持清醒的状态,又称作清明梦。影片讲述的是在3年前丢失了孩子的父亲通过清醒梦在梦中寻找线索的犯罪惊悚片。《清醒梦》中,高洙饰演的“大浩”是热血记者出身,在职场上一旦盯紧什么事件就要追究到底,在丢了儿子之后通过清醒梦寻找线索,展现了一个孤军奋斗的父亲形象。薛景求将在片中饰演对诡异事件很感兴趣的警察“方燮”一角,他在得知事件之后也非常积极地帮助高洙。姜惠贞饰演的是“大浩”的朋友“素贤”,也是精神科医生,对大浩在清醒梦中寻找线索给予指导。在“大浩”周边徘徊的神秘人物则由朴有天饰演。因为过去的因缘而积极帮助“大浩”的70岁退休黑道组织成员“成弼”由朴仁焕饰演。还有千振浩将饰演身怀秘密的大集团会长“赵明哲”。