剧情简介
份视The head of a secret organization assembles a crew to steal back artwork plundered by Nazis during World War II.
9月份视频
份视The head of a secret organization assembles a crew to steal back artwork plundered by Nazis during World War II.
王品
回复 :哈利是一名退休的警察，一日，他受朋友杰克艾姆斯与凯萨琳夫妇之托送一个包裹，没想到里面竟然是勒索金，从此，他就陷入了谋杀与恐吓交缠的危险中。哈利一心想找出事实真相，因此游走在执法与犯法的模糊边缘，他一步一步的走向了20年前，一宗牵涉凯萨琳前夫的失踪案，这宗沉封许久的悬案背后，到底隐藏了什么不可告人的秘密？
蔡小虎
回复 :1964年Mississippi（密西西比，我的印象中一直不太好，名字都那么怪）的Nioba，一个非常黑暗的夜晚，Eli MacCleary和Caroline夫妇的车子在路上抛了锚，Eli独自前往找救援，留下Caroline在车上，他回来时发现太太倒在路边的树林里，她被强奸了。不久，Caroline怀孕生下儿子Michael。转眼十七年过去了，如今的Michael得了一种怪病，肿瘤压迫脑垂体使他经常发狂，不能自制，还有他那特殊的化学反应机制，这些都被医生认为是遗传病，但Eli和Caroline知道儿子不是他们的，为了找到真正的原因，他们又回到那个他们不愿提起的地方——Nioba，也从此揭开一个陈年的惊世奇案（或许叫做“奇冤”吧！）。原来，强奸Caroline的是Billy Connors，他与另一名在当地臭名昭著的Lionel Curwin的妻子通奸，被Lionel所在地窖里，饿极之下已失去理智，但Lionel有时会从表兄弟那里拿一些人的尸体回来喂他。后来，Lionel却不知被什么给撕碎吃掉了一部分，房子也给烧了，并成了墓地。知情的只有家族里的少数几人。在那个夜晚，Billy把仇恨种在了Caroline的身上。如今的Michael夜晚会四处寻找当年与Lionel有关的人，并把他们杀了，这种仇恨太可怕了·，一切已经不受控制……。影评：一部精神病和基因变异的的电影，故事讲得比较好，从科学理论上好像有点依据，只是时间上讲不过去。因为背景在密西西比的沼泽，使影片的气氛比较阴暗，但娱乐元素很丰富。电影里一直留有一个疑团到最后才揭晓，那就是Connors和Curwin家的那段仇恨的原因，可惜被我不小心在剧情里透露了出来。Ronny Cox曾在我们熟悉的《铁甲威龙》里饰演反面角色。总的来说，题材上是一部比较成功的B级制作电影。信鬼神的可认为是Michael被附了身，信科学的则......。
童安格
回复 :Mavie is 27 years old and has just moved to the French capital from the provinces. She dreams of a future as a writer but is plagued by doubt and uncertainty. 76-year-old misanthrope Georges runs a bookshop in Paris – or has he merely been forced to take refuge there to escape his past? These are two peculiar creatures indeed. Georges is cynical and no longer expects much from life, while Mavie is still brimming with expectation. Yet something magical happens between them, until Georges' dark secret suddenly catches up with him – and Mavie is caught up in something very different...Director Elise Girard succeeds in making a dreamlike film full of surprising absurdities. It’s not just love that appears out of the blue for the two protagonists, but also some quite literal strange birds. Girard depicts love beyond the barriers of age in a way that is both unexpected and moving, romantic instead of physical, timeless instead of fashionable. The film reminds us of the multifaceted nature of love as well as how fleeting it can be, existing not yesterday or tomorrow but above all in the present.
