剧情简介
该影片讲述民国年间，乡村卫生署的底层办事员苏正怀（尹昭德 饰）带着大女儿苏婷（夏一瑶 饰）和儿子苏月笙（楚喻贺 饰）去省城探亲，乡村在火车上遇到了失联已久的二女儿苏玲（朱娅 饰）。火车行驶途中遭遇鼠群袭击，苏月笙不幸被老鼠咬伤，陷入昏迷，为了拯救小儿子和众多被咬伤的乘客，苏正怀和苏婷决定冒险前往小白河医院取药，就此开启了一场极限大逃亡。
乡村乱情全文在线阅读春暖花开
该影片讲述民国年间，乡村卫生署的底层办事员苏正怀（尹昭德 饰）带着大女儿苏婷（夏一瑶 饰）和儿子苏月笙（楚喻贺 饰）去省城探亲，乡村在火车上遇到了失联已久的二女儿苏玲（朱娅 饰）。火车行驶途中遭遇鼠群袭击，苏月笙不幸被老鼠咬伤，陷入昏迷，为了拯救小儿子和众多被咬伤的乘客，苏正怀和苏婷决定冒险前往小白河医院取药，就此开启了一场极限大逃亡。
徐誉滕
回复 :片名和灵感都取自莎士比亚的《仲夏夜之梦》。阿根廷导演马蒂亚斯·皮涅罗新作品，曾入围2016年洛迦诺电影节主竞赛单元，主要讲述一个阿根廷姑娘要把莎士比亚的戏剧翻译成西班牙语的故事。
反町隆史
回复 :一次交通意外，改变了汤马士的一生，皆因自他出生那天，四个来自不同背景的游魂野鬼已经伴他左右。可是成长中的汤一直过着不大愉快的童年生活，因此他们讨论后决定助汤一臂之力，令他事事顺境，结果反而弄出连串笑话。
牧野由依
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
